Skip to main content

Why you shouldn’t care about Brexit or Trump

It’s well known that the media is a business and businesses need money to survive. They make money from your eyesballs which generate ad revenue. Brexit, Trump, horrible business people, naked celebrities, the NRA, are all things that make money for the media because they provoke strong emotional reactions. You’re going to watch because you care. The fact that there are so many bad things going on is a good thing for media.

But is it a good thing for you? Most people, millennials especially, want to be fulfilled, want to make a difference. This is a gut feeling, but I want to say 1/50 millennials I know are on a clear path to doing the thing they were meant to be doing. Your attention is valuable. Your mind share is valuable. But I don’t think I’ve ever met anybody who’s ever been fulfilled by being angry about things other people want you to be angry about. So why would you end up spending that incredibly valuable resource, caring about things that aren’t going to make you happy or fulfilled? It seems to me that the media makes money from making you angry or sad. That is, they make money by feeding you junk food for the soul.

500 years ago, we had to worry about famine, war and disease. Today, we have to worry about some of those things, but for the most part, we live in a pretty amazing time. We have super computers in our pockets. We have magical translation tools (Google Translate) that allows us to break down the barriers of language. We can share life’s most important moments with loved ones halfway around the world. Quest Nutrition is on a mission to end metabolic disease. Tesla is on a mission to end dependence on fossil fuels. Google is on a mission to make the world’s information, accessible.

We live in a day and age where there’s really not much that’s stopping you from making the change you want to make or doing the things you’d like to do. That said, I highly doubt any of that change is accomplished by being angry at many things, especially the things that are fed to you by the media. It’s seems much more likely that being focused on the few things you can change, grants you a much better chance at both making you fulfilled and positively affecting the world. 

So here’s a thought, maybe I’m crazy: instead of being angry at things that other people want you to be angry about, why not focus on the things that you want to care about? The tragic reality is, if you don’t have your own mission, your own direction, then someone is going to control you and make money from it. I’m not saying, don’t care. But I am saying, define and care about your own mission first and foremost. Life is short, and I feel it would be a tragedy to live in such an amazing time only to be an intellectual slave. How much has Trump really affected you? Do you care more about Trump than your own personal mission? It seems much better own yourself, rather than the media or anybody else. 


Popular posts from this blog

How to get 70 job interviews in 17 days

When I was but a wee lad, I dreamed of being a janitor for NASA. There's just something awesome about playing a part, no matter how small, of something that dares to push the world forward. While I no longer hold my old lofty dreams of working for NASA, I have had to recently look for jobs. For whatever contrived reason, the conventional thinking behind how people should search for jobs falls under two categories: networking and job sites. While those approaches work, a very useful metaphor for how you might view yourself is that you're a business. You sell your product (your time) for a salary (your revenue). You might argue, most wages in the western world are $20,000 USD to $500,000 USD. If you're a business, then it's probably also helpful to think about selling your product (time) like a business. Typically, different price points in business dictate different sales and marketing techniques. Below say, $10 a month, direct sales (sales where you sell to people on …

Differences and similarities in web servers

If you talked to a new grad and asked them "how can I achieve concurrency in code?" There are two obvious answers: multi-threading and multi-processing. Factually, both approaches are schemes to map instructions to the CPU/bare metal. Although from the hardware's standpoint, they are very different, from an engineer's standpoint, many use cases tend to be fairly similar. This matters for web servers.

In fact, for a long time, those two methods (multi-processing and multi-threading) were the primary ways to map HTTP requests to a web server's hardware. That is, if a request comes in, a request will map to a process or map to a thread. In Apache HTTPD-speak, you can control which scheme you use. That mapping component is called the "Multi-Processing Module" or MPM. This is all fine and dandy if the requests don't do anything requiring blocking or asynchronous behavior and all requests are short lived. However, nearly all modern web applications requir…

What marketing might look like in the future

There once lived a wise, middle aged, bald prophet named Marc Andreessen. His job, was to profit from prophecy. Today, he is one of the most well known, and respected, venture capitalists in the world. He is famous for some of his sayings such as "if you want to see where a bubble is forming, follow the MBAs" in reference to the MBAs going to Wall St during the mortgage backed securities crisis of 2008 and the dot com bust in 2002. Arguably, his most famous saying is/was "software is eating the world". Today, it's a foregone conclusion that, software has broken the way a lot of industries fundamentally operate. I think it's particularly interesting, however, to think about what that means for marketing. I'm of the opinion that, very few companies really understand what they're doing and that modern marketing should not only look like engineering... it should be engineering.

One way to think about marketing is that there are two key components to mar…